Skip to main content

CF1

http://blog.adamcameron.me/2014/03/confusion-as-to-why-cfhtmltopdf-is-not.html

I hate to be the bring bad news, but request timeout errors are the most
difficult to track down because the error reporting on ACF usually just
points to a line that doesn't make sense.  This is because ACT only
checks of the request timeout is exceeded on certain tags (not all
tags).  CFloop is one of them.  The error you are seeing is that it
checked the request timeout at the end of the loop.  The loop itself is
NOT causing the error.  For example, your request timeout may be
something like 30 seconds.  At the beginning of the loop, the request
time is 29.99 and therefore hasn't timed out.  At the end of the loop,
it has timed out and CF reports the loop as the error.
What you need to do is look for things that can cause the request to
take too much time:

* queries
* web services / rest requests
* cfdocument
* cfimage
* cfpdf
* file operations
* cfmail operations

We all "setArgs()" after you announce an event (internally).  More than
likely -- something is causing the request to take a while and then you
are announcing another event.  If you know the event name of the
request, you should be able to trace yourself through the code and see
if any of the "big" things I listed could be causing problems. In the
past, the hard I tracked down had to do with a slow SMTP server and
switching to spooling to disk instead of directly to the server fixed
the issue.

Let us know what you figure out.  Sadly, I wish I could say -- oh that's
an issue with Mach-II, but alas -- there aren't any known issues with
request timeouts with Mach-II.  They are almost always one of those
things I listed.

.pjf


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rand mm 10

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2447791/define-vs-const Oh const vs define, many time I got unexpected interview question. As this one, I do not know much or try to study this. My work flow, and I believe of many programmer is that search topic only when we have task or job to tackle. We ignore many 'basic', 'fundamental' documents, RTFM is boring. So I think it is a trade off between the two way of study language. And I think there are a bridge or balanced way to extract both advantage of two method. There are some huge issue with programmer like me that prevent we master some technique that take only little time if doing properly. For example, some Red Hat certificate program, lesson, course that I have learned during Collage gave our exceptional useful when it cover almost all topic while working with Linux. I remember it called something like RHEL (RedHat Enterprise Linux) Certificate... I think there are many tons of documents, guide n books about Linux bu

Martin Fowler - Software Architecture - Making Architecture matter

  https://martinfowler.com/architecture/ One can appreciate the point of this presentation when one's sense of code smell is trained, functional and utilized. Those controlling the budget as well as developer leads should understand the design stamina hypothesis, so that the appropriate focus and priority is given to internal quality - otherwise pay a high price soon. Andrew Farrell 8 months ago I love that he was able to give an important lesson on the “How?” of software architecture at the very end: delegate decisions to those with the time to focus on them. Very nice and straight-forward talk about the value of software architecture For me, architecture is the distribution of complexity in a system. And also, how subsystems communicate with each other. A battle between craftmanship and the economics and economics always win... https://hackernoon.com/applying-clean-architecture-on-web-application-with-modular-pattern-7b11f1b89011 1. Independent of Frameworks 2. Testable 3. Indepe